20 Years Imprisonment and a $5,000,000 fine!: Industrial Manslaughter and You

Phil Brunner • Dec 30, 2020
Significant changes to Western Australia’s Work Health and Safety laws were passed in November 2020. Although  not yet operational * the changes are coming and every business owner needs to be prepared.

But what does this mean for your family, business and farm? and why is the term “Industrial Manslaughter” getting thrown around?

The Work Health and Safety Bill

In 2011, Safe Work Australia developed a single set of WHS laws to be implemented across Australia, known as the ‘Model‘ Laws. For these Model laws to become binding the Commonwealth, States and Territories must separately implement them as their own laws.
Western Australia has two work safety law regimes, the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 (the OSH Act) and the Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994 (the MSI Act). 

The Work Health & Safety Bill 2019 (WA) (the Bill) brings these laws together whilst adopting much of the Model Work Health and Safety laws. The objectives of the Bill is said to provide a balanced and nationally consistent framework to protect the health and safety of workers, improve safety outcomes in workplaces, reduce compliance costs for businesses and to improve efficiency for regulatory agencies.

The Bill also includes other key reforms, such as a prohibition of insurance against fines imposed for a work health and safety offence as well as the introduction of a charge of industrial manslaughter.

Industrial Manslaughter

Previously, the term “industrial accident” was commonly used to describe an incident resulting in death at the workplace. However, this term implied no causality and no culpability, something that, while significant and terrible, indicated no error or reasonability to be assigned.

The government recognises that workplace injuries and deaths are mostly caused by, but not limited to, a combination of factors, including poor system design, bad behaviour as well as poor and improper choices.

The proposed industrial manslaughter laws are split into two different categories, one being a “crime” and the other a “simple offense”. The table below highlights some  of the main points and differences. 

An offence under the MSI Act and the OSH Act which resulted in a death of an employee would draw a fine of up to $500, 000.

There are few important things to note from the Bill:

1. More than one person can concurrently have the same duty.
2. The duties that apply cover persons conducting businesses or undertakings, officers as well as workers and any person at the workplace.
3. The duties appear quite loosely defined, such as, a duty to take reasonable care that a person’s actions do not adversely affect the health and safety of another person. Neither “reasonable care” nor “adversely affect” is clearly defined, which means it could be open to a number of different interpretations.
4. The test for whether or not a simple offence has been committed involving death at a workplace is simply whether or not a person had a health and safety duty and whether or not the person has failed to comply with that duty. Any knowledge or any mental element is not necessary for the evidentiary threshold to be passed.

Differences compared to Other Jurisdictions

While one of the intentions of the new laws is to bring harmony to work health and safety laws used throughout Australia, the reality is different. For example, in the Northern Territory, the maximum penalty for the offense of Industrial Manslaughter is life imprisonment and $10,205,000 while in Victoria, the maximum fine for a body corporate will be $16,522,000 once its proposed laws come into effect on 1 July 2020.

Additionally, as mentioned above, the Bill provides that an offence will have been committed if an individual, or organisation, has a health and safety duty and simply fails to comply with that duty and subsequently causes the death of an individual. 
While jurisdictions like Victoria have proposed laws that consider conduct as negligent only if it involves “a great falling short of the standard of care”, the Bill does not provide for the degree of the failure to comply with a person’s duty before it becomes an offence, just that the duty wasn’t complied with.

One of the health and safety duties imposed on a person with “management or control of a workplace” is to ensure that the means of entering and exiting a workplace and anything arises from the workplace are without risk to health and safety of any person. This appears to set the bar relatively low when it comes to establishing whether or not there is a duty that can be breached. With no definition as to what properly constitutes a failure to comply with that duty, we may be seeing a claim of industrial manslaughter for any cause of death at a workplace.

Where to next with your work health and safety measures?

No two work environments are alike and, after considering all the variable factors and different management styles of different organisations, very few are even similar. Given the potential seriousness of these charges it is essential that every agribusiness from the local farmer to CBH reviews, updates and implements clear safety practices, policies and equipment. Documentation and Inductions will be essential to protect your business and yourself.

*At the time of printing this article the legislation was not operational. Please contact us for an update on this matter.

Disclaimer: This information is of a general nature only and is not intended to be a substitute for specific legal advice. It is recommended that these matters be discussed with your lawyer.

05 Mar, 2024
Find out what we have been up to and recent events in our March 2024 newsletter .
20 Feb, 2024
The Human Rights Commission may take action against employers who fail to actively eliminate sexual harassment, discrimination and victimisation in the workplace, as part of a positive duty reform. While the reform itself was introduced under the Sex Discrimination Act in 2022, a change was put in place last December - and every employer, including those in the agricultural sector, is affected. This change has provided the commission with new powers to investigate and enforce compliance with positive duty and investigate organisations or businesses where it "reasonably suspects" non-compliance. What does this mean for shearing contractors, sheep producers and other primary producers? Speaking at the WA Shearing Industry Association (WASIA) general meeting last month, Bailiwick Legal solicitor Matilda Lloyd said the enforcement power involved inquiries and investigations similar to WorkSafe. She said a complaint did not have to be made for an inspector from the commission to visit and look over a workplace, and see if there is any kind of sexual harassment occurring. "The commission looks at policies and procedures, and essentially you need to be able to demonstrate that you're compliant with this positive duty. "When you think about it in the context of a shearing shed, it is the safety checklist you have in place for when people enter the shed. "Those are the things you need to consider with sexual harassment as well." Ms Lloyd said the commissioner never had the power to conduct an investigation before and, as such, practically how it was going to work was an unknown. "We don't know whether they're going to be coming out and doing regular inspections, what those inspections are going to look like in terms of time or how thorough they are going to be, " sh e said. "They need to be thought of the same way as a WorkSafe investigation, whereby it could happen at any point whether a complaint is made or not. "Investigators will expect employers to show that they are actively trying to eliminate this form of unlawful conduct." If an inquiry occurs, what will happen? If an employer wasn't taking the correct measures to stop sexual harassment, discrimination and victimisation from occurring, they could be issued a compliance notice. Ms Lloyd said if the notice wasn't adhered to and an inspector returned, they could apply to the Federal Court to have that positive duty enforced. What is positive duty? Ms Lloyd said a positive duty was a legal obligation on an employer or person conducting a business or undertaking to take reasonable and proportionate measures to eliminate unlawful behaviours in the context of work, workplaces and working relationships. In the case of shearing contractors, sheep producers and other primary producers, she said that obligation was on the employer and applied to all staff, workers, contractors, customers and people entering, for example, a shearing shed. She said the obligation was "very broad" and applied right across the board. "Enforcing positive duty is pretty straightforward in terms of the employer, but when we look at the other parties involved it is extensive, " Ms Lloyd said. "When we are talking about sexual harassment in the workplace we are talking in the shed and in a vehicle on the way to work or another shed. "It is also offsite, so if you are having work drinks at the quarters or wherever afterwards - that's also a workplace within the definitions of the act. "The obligation applies across the board in all of these circumstances. "And also applies to visitors, so if you have farmers and they bring their wives, it is anyone coming into that shed or environment." In the context of positive duty, what do contractors need to do? Firstly, employers need to understand what sexual harassment, sex-based harassment, discrimination and victimisation is. Ms Lloyd said employers were responsible for leading their team, so it was important to understand what the laws were and how they affected not only them, but their employees. "When we talk about sexual harassment we talk about unwelcome conduct that is of a sexual nature or requests for sexual favours, touching, requesting dates and so forth," she said. "Whereas sex-based harassment is harassment that is targeted at a particular sex. "This could be making sexist comments about a woman because she's a woman or making sexist comments about a man because he's a man. "Then victimisation is about targeting someone because they've made a complaint." Ms Lloyd said a conversation then needed to be had to educate employees, whether that be face-to-face, by Whatsapp or having it displayed in the shed. She said there were resources and guidelines available through the Human Rights Commission, which helped with this. "Have that conversation - as an employer understand what sexual harassment is but then talk to your employees and be serious about educating your employees, " Ms Lloyd said. "It is about actually having that conversation and then thinking about what material can be given to them. "The whole point is to make it easy, so people understand. "Then it goes into training and support - is there someone in your team people can talk to?" The seven standards The commission has released guidelines for complying with the positive duty under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984. The guidelines are centred around seven standards - leadership, culture, knowledge, risk management, support, reporting and response, and monitoring, evaluation and transparency. Examples of practical actions that organisations or businesses can take to meet each of the standards are set out in the guidelines. Ms Lloyd said, as each business is different, it depended on how big a team was, what was going to be practical and cost-effective in the workplace. She said the commission would look at the different standards if there was an investigation or inquiry. How often do employers need to talk to their team about this? Ms Lloyd said it should be looked at similarly to safety or work related issues, whether that be a toolbox or regular meeting once a week or every couple of days. She said if a contractor was starting a new job or visiting a place they hadn't been to before, it was about having that conversation upon arrival. "When everyone's preparing for their first break, sit down and have a chat about general safety as well, " Ms Lloyd said. "That's the first step, and then follow it up a month later when you start a new shed. "It is about consistently and actively taking measures to create a safe space. "It seems obvious that once you've gone through your checklist you then talk to the people coming into that environment, who are your workers, and alert them to what you have found. "Similarly, with positive duty, a checklist is proof that you are doing the right thing if you are audited." Does insurance cover sexual discrimination cases? Having insurance does not diminish positive duty, it just safeguards employers against potential damage and loss against their business if they are sued. Ms Lloyd said sexual discrimination cases, which travelled through the Federal Court, were not cheap and often have adverse outcomes from an award of damages perspective. "If we talk about Work Health and Safety, as you know, that is a serious issue you have to take onboard and consider, " she said, "And that's the way I think employers need to frame their conduct when talking about and implementing measures to prevent sexual harassment, discrimination and victimisation." Is an employer covered if they have put everything in place, but those rules are still broken? Ms Lloyd said an employer would be protected if they have been able to eliminate as much as they can with the resources available to them. She said it was important to remember sexual harassment and discrimination is unlawful conduct. "In terms of positive duty, by taking all reasonable steps and measures given the resources available to you, you will be able to mount a solid defence against any claim. "If you've done your duty positively and it can be demonstrated that you've exercised your role in appropriate fashion, then that will be solid defence." For more information on the positive duty reform and seven standards, go to humanrights.gov.au
14 Dec, 2023
See what's been happening and current topics of interest in our December 2023 newsletter .
Share by: