What Happens if you Die Without a Will?

Oct 30, 2022

Dying without a Will (also known as dying ‘intestate’).

what happens if you die without a will?

In our last blog, we mentioned the alarming number of Australians that die without a valid Will, leaving no verifiable proof of their wishes as to what happens to their estate.


In this article we are discussing what happens when you die without a Will (also known as dying ‘intestate’). Intestacy also occurs when a deceased person has left a Will that only deals with part of their estate, or the Will is not valid


We’re going to be covering the legal processes that are put in place for such a scenario and how to settle potential disputes that may arise over property that has not been properly distributed after the passing of the deceased.


Without further ado, let’s get to it.


How would the estate be distributed?


When a person dies intestate, the Administration Act 1903 (WA) (“Administration Act”) governs who is entitled to that person’s estate and how it will be distributed.


The process of deciding who gets what from that estate depends on a number of factors, including what relatives are alive at the time of death and the value of the estate.


This is a good moment to point out that no, if you die intestate, the government is not automatically entitled to the entirety of the deceased’s estate. This outcome is at the very end of the line and typically only happens if the deceased had no living relatives.


Whilst in some circumstances it may seem that distributing the deceased’s estate in accordance with the Administration Act is of a similar outcome to what the deceased would have written in a Will in any event, it should be noted that more often than not the results tend to be less than desirable.


A Case Study


Let’s use an example to understand this better.


We have a family that consists of dad, mum, child (aged 3), child (aged 5) and child (aged 8). Dad and mum each own a car in their respective names, there is a joint bank account and mum owned the family home solely.


Mum passes away unexpectedly and without leaving a Will. Let’s say, for the sake of this example, that mum’s car was worth $20,000, and the home $500,000, mum’s estate is worth a total of $520.000 (noting that the other car was in dad’s name so that remains his and the bank account was joint so that automatically transfers to dad upon mum’s death).


As mum died without a Will, she died intestate. This means the distribution of her estate is going to be governed by the Administration Act.


To determine who is entitled to mum’s estate and how it is to be distributed to such beneficiaries, the following questions needs to be considered:

1.   Did mum have a husband/wife/de facto partner à Yes.

2.   Did mum have kids (or kids of deceased kids) à Yes.

3.   What was the value of the estate, being above or below the current threshold of $472,000 à above (mum’s estate was $520,000).


Therefore, mum’s estate would be distributed as follows:

·        Dad would be entitled to the household chattels, $472,000 of mum’s estate and 1/3 of the balance; and

·        Children would be entitled to share in the remaining 2/3 of the balance equally.


A Prevailing Problem


Whilst this outcome may not seem problematic at first as dad is entitled to a majority of the estate (which presumably is what mum would have wanted in any event), it does give rise to some potentially problematic issues.


Deducting dad’s automatic entitlement to the first $472,000 means there is $48,000 left for distribution between dad and the children. $16,000 (being 1/3) is dad’s whilst the other $32,000 (being 2/3) is to be split between the children equally.


As the only assets are the family home and mum’s car, it is going to be difficult to split these assets in accordance with the above without having to convert them to cash. This is perhaps more problematic when considering the family home as it may result in the home having to be sold to effect the intended distribution.


Further, as the children are all under age, dad would need to hold their portions on trust until they were old enough to receive their benefit. This may be assets that the dad may require in order to provide for the children as they grow up.


One can imagine how this scenario would be further complicated if there was a blended family or second marriage, which today is quite common.


All these issues could easily be avoided with the preparation of a valid Will.


But who would be the Executor?


We’ve discussed what happens to the deceased’s estate when they die intestate, but we haven’t discussed who is appointed as the executor.


When someone dies intestate, Letters of Administration must be applied for and granted from the Supreme Court appointing an administrator (same role as an executor) prior to the estate being able to be dealt with. This process can be more complicated, timely and costly than the Probate process (where the deceased died with a valid Will appointing an executor).


So who exactly gets to be the administrator in such situations?


Any direct beneficiary of the estate can apply to be the administrator, so long as they are over the age of 18 and are of sound mind. If there are no direct relatives then anyone, including a creditor of the estate, can apply for Letters of Administration.


In the case study above, the direct beneficiaries of mum’s estate were dad and the children, however as the children are minors dad would be the only person in the family entitled to apply for Letters of Administration.


Conclusion


Having a loved one die can be a terrible experience by itself long before anyone even mentions a Will, but having them die intestate does nothing to better such a terrible scenario.


If you unfortunately find yourself in this kind of situation, it is recommended you seek out legal advice tailored to your particular circumstances in order to formulate the best possible course of action.

                   

Please contact our office on (08) 9321 5451 or office@bailiwicklegal.com.au for more information.


The contents of this article does not constitute legal advice, is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. It is designed and intended to provide general information in summary form on legal topics, current at the time of publication, for general informational purposes only. The material may not apply to all jurisdictions. You should seek legal advice or other professional advice in relation to any particular matters you may have.


By Danielle Edwards (Senior Associate)


05 Mar, 2024
Find out what we have been up to and recent events in our March 2024 newsletter .
20 Feb, 2024
The Human Rights Commission may take action against employers who fail to actively eliminate sexual harassment, discrimination and victimisation in the workplace, as part of a positive duty reform. While the reform itself was introduced under the Sex Discrimination Act in 2022, a change was put in place last December - and every employer, including those in the agricultural sector, is affected. This change has provided the commission with new powers to investigate and enforce compliance with positive duty and investigate organisations or businesses where it "reasonably suspects" non-compliance. What does this mean for shearing contractors, sheep producers and other primary producers? Speaking at the WA Shearing Industry Association (WASIA) general meeting last month, Bailiwick Legal solicitor Matilda Lloyd said the enforcement power involved inquiries and investigations similar to WorkSafe. She said a complaint did not have to be made for an inspector from the commission to visit and look over a workplace, and see if there is any kind of sexual harassment occurring. "The commission looks at policies and procedures, and essentially you need to be able to demonstrate that you're compliant with this positive duty. "When you think about it in the context of a shearing shed, it is the safety checklist you have in place for when people enter the shed. "Those are the things you need to consider with sexual harassment as well." Ms Lloyd said the commissioner never had the power to conduct an investigation before and, as such, practically how it was going to work was an unknown. "We don't know whether they're going to be coming out and doing regular inspections, what those inspections are going to look like in terms of time or how thorough they are going to be, " sh e said. "They need to be thought of the same way as a WorkSafe investigation, whereby it could happen at any point whether a complaint is made or not. "Investigators will expect employers to show that they are actively trying to eliminate this form of unlawful conduct." If an inquiry occurs, what will happen? If an employer wasn't taking the correct measures to stop sexual harassment, discrimination and victimisation from occurring, they could be issued a compliance notice. Ms Lloyd said if the notice wasn't adhered to and an inspector returned, they could apply to the Federal Court to have that positive duty enforced. What is positive duty? Ms Lloyd said a positive duty was a legal obligation on an employer or person conducting a business or undertaking to take reasonable and proportionate measures to eliminate unlawful behaviours in the context of work, workplaces and working relationships. In the case of shearing contractors, sheep producers and other primary producers, she said that obligation was on the employer and applied to all staff, workers, contractors, customers and people entering, for example, a shearing shed. She said the obligation was "very broad" and applied right across the board. "Enforcing positive duty is pretty straightforward in terms of the employer, but when we look at the other parties involved it is extensive, " Ms Lloyd said. "When we are talking about sexual harassment in the workplace we are talking in the shed and in a vehicle on the way to work or another shed. "It is also offsite, so if you are having work drinks at the quarters or wherever afterwards - that's also a workplace within the definitions of the act. "The obligation applies across the board in all of these circumstances. "And also applies to visitors, so if you have farmers and they bring their wives, it is anyone coming into that shed or environment." In the context of positive duty, what do contractors need to do? Firstly, employers need to understand what sexual harassment, sex-based harassment, discrimination and victimisation is. Ms Lloyd said employers were responsible for leading their team, so it was important to understand what the laws were and how they affected not only them, but their employees. "When we talk about sexual harassment we talk about unwelcome conduct that is of a sexual nature or requests for sexual favours, touching, requesting dates and so forth," she said. "Whereas sex-based harassment is harassment that is targeted at a particular sex. "This could be making sexist comments about a woman because she's a woman or making sexist comments about a man because he's a man. "Then victimisation is about targeting someone because they've made a complaint." Ms Lloyd said a conversation then needed to be had to educate employees, whether that be face-to-face, by Whatsapp or having it displayed in the shed. She said there were resources and guidelines available through the Human Rights Commission, which helped with this. "Have that conversation - as an employer understand what sexual harassment is but then talk to your employees and be serious about educating your employees, " Ms Lloyd said. "It is about actually having that conversation and then thinking about what material can be given to them. "The whole point is to make it easy, so people understand. "Then it goes into training and support - is there someone in your team people can talk to?" The seven standards The commission has released guidelines for complying with the positive duty under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984. The guidelines are centred around seven standards - leadership, culture, knowledge, risk management, support, reporting and response, and monitoring, evaluation and transparency. Examples of practical actions that organisations or businesses can take to meet each of the standards are set out in the guidelines. Ms Lloyd said, as each business is different, it depended on how big a team was, what was going to be practical and cost-effective in the workplace. She said the commission would look at the different standards if there was an investigation or inquiry. How often do employers need to talk to their team about this? Ms Lloyd said it should be looked at similarly to safety or work related issues, whether that be a toolbox or regular meeting once a week or every couple of days. She said if a contractor was starting a new job or visiting a place they hadn't been to before, it was about having that conversation upon arrival. "When everyone's preparing for their first break, sit down and have a chat about general safety as well, " Ms Lloyd said. "That's the first step, and then follow it up a month later when you start a new shed. "It is about consistently and actively taking measures to create a safe space. "It seems obvious that once you've gone through your checklist you then talk to the people coming into that environment, who are your workers, and alert them to what you have found. "Similarly, with positive duty, a checklist is proof that you are doing the right thing if you are audited." Does insurance cover sexual discrimination cases? Having insurance does not diminish positive duty, it just safeguards employers against potential damage and loss against their business if they are sued. Ms Lloyd said sexual discrimination cases, which travelled through the Federal Court, were not cheap and often have adverse outcomes from an award of damages perspective. "If we talk about Work Health and Safety, as you know, that is a serious issue you have to take onboard and consider, " she said, "And that's the way I think employers need to frame their conduct when talking about and implementing measures to prevent sexual harassment, discrimination and victimisation." Is an employer covered if they have put everything in place, but those rules are still broken? Ms Lloyd said an employer would be protected if they have been able to eliminate as much as they can with the resources available to them. She said it was important to remember sexual harassment and discrimination is unlawful conduct. "In terms of positive duty, by taking all reasonable steps and measures given the resources available to you, you will be able to mount a solid defence against any claim. "If you've done your duty positively and it can be demonstrated that you've exercised your role in appropriate fashion, then that will be solid defence." For more information on the positive duty reform and seven standards, go to humanrights.gov.au
14 Dec, 2023
See what's been happening and current topics of interest in our December 2023 newsletter .
Share by: