Harvest Labour

October 29, 2026

Author name

Don't be Casual When Employing Harvest Casuals

 

Harvest is a busy time for farmers and their workers. The lead up to harvest comes quickly and the essentials of recruitment and compliance can often be overlooked. However, it is important that you get appropriate contractual arrangements in place early and that you cover workers’ lawful entitlements to avoid future disputes. 


Employees vs Contractors 


During harvest, labour is often engaged on either an employment or subcontract basis. From a risk perspective, it is important to know the difference between the two because there can be severe penalties if you misclassify an employee as an independent contractor (or vice versa). When considering whether to employ or subcontract your harvest labour, the following factors should be considered:


  • are there fixed working hours;
  • who controls and directs the work;
  • who bears the commercial and financial risk;
  • is there an ongoing expectation of work;
  • what is the method of payment;
  • how is superannuation to be dealt with; 
  • is tax pay-as-you-go (PAYG) or Goods and Services Tax (GST);
  • do you require pre-engagement medicals and or training; and
  • who covers insurance, workers compensation and public liability. 


If you engage a person to provide their labour, establish set hours of work for them and maintain control over the work the person does, then it is likely that the person will be (at law) considered an employee and you will be required to meet certain minimum statutory entitlements, such as payment of a minimum wage, regulated hours of work, leave (casuals are entitled to leave in certain circumstances) and superannuation payments.

 

On the other hand, if you engage a person who uses their own harvester (or other similar equipment) and contracts with other farmers to get their crops off, then the person is likely to be (at law) considered a contractor.


It is important to also note that some statutory obligations, such as safety laws, are likely to apply regardless of whether the person is an employee or contractor whilst working on your property.


Written Agreements 


Regardless of whether you engage employees or contractors, a written agreement should always be set up to establish the appropriate terms and conditions applicable to the relationship. For employees, it is important to have an agreement that provides for conditions such as the role, hours of work, pay and notice, to name a few. 


Employee Entitlements 


Employees will invariably be covered by an “Award”. An Award is a legal document which sets minimum terms of employment within a specific industry or occupation. The two Awards that are most applicable to harvest labour in Western Australia are the Pastoral Award 2020 (Cmlth) and the Farm Employees Award (WA). Again, it is important to understand which of these Awards will apply to your employees. This is a topic for another time. 


Information about the above Awards can be found using the below links:


 

What Should You Do


Taking the time to sort out employment contracts, and contractor agreements, can be the difference between a swift harvest or a stressful one and minimises the prospect of dispute. It is therefore important, and strongly recommended, to engage with a professional to assist you in this area. 


By Matilda Lloyd (Solicitor)


If you would like more information about harvest labour, the Awards or contractual agreements, please contact us on (08) 9321 5451 or by email at office@bailiwicklegal.com.au.


For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au/


The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.


October 29, 2026
For many growers, the biggest barrier to pursuing a claim is not the legal process itself. It is the relationship. In regional communities, suppliers, agronomists and growers often work together over many years, and many farmers are understandably reluctant to raise concerns if they believe it may damage a valued business relationship. Recent discussions regarding the performance of certain canola varieties have highlighted an important issue for farming businesses: protecting your legal rights does not necessarily mean taking an aggressive approach or ending a long-standing commercial relationship. Where concerns arise about the performance of a seed variety, chemical or other agricultural product, growers are often hesitant to make inquiries or seek compensation because the supplier may be a trusted local business or a person they have dealt with for decades. However, raising legitimate concerns and seeking advice should not be viewed as a personal attack. In many cases, suppliers will notify their insurer as soon as a significant claim is raised. From that point, discussions regarding liability and compensation are often managed by insurers, loss assessors and legal representatives. As a result, a grower may effectively be dealing with an insurance claim rather than a dispute directly with the supplier. That distinction is important. A claim can often be investigated and resolved without permanently damaging an otherwise productive business relationship. At the same time, growers should be aware that not every supplier is insured for every type of loss. Some businesses may not carry insurance that responds to large-scale agricultural claims, while others may not have sufficient coverage where multiple growers are affected. Early advice can therefore be critical in understanding both your legal position and the practical realities of recovery.  If you are experiencing concerns regarding crop performance, keep detailed records, retain product packaging, batch information, invoices and correspondence, obtain independent agronomic advice, and seek legal advice before signing any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Protecting your rights does not have to mean burning bridges. Often, the best outcomes are achieved through early communication, careful investigation and practical resolution. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.
October 29, 2026
One of the most common concerns we hear from growers experiencing issues with agricultural products is: "I don't want to sue someone I've known for years." In regional communities, business relationships matter. Suppliers, agronomists and growers often work together over many seasons, and many farmers are understandably reluctant to take action if they believe doing so may damage those relationships. However, pursuing a claim does not necessarily mean attacking a long-standing business relationship. In many cases, the supplier will notify its insurer of the claim and the matter will be managed by the insurer and its representatives. Where insurance is available, discussions regarding compensation often proceed through the insurer's claims process rather than as a personal dispute between grower and supplier. For that reason, growers should not assume that raising legitimate concerns about product performance will automatically result in the loss of an important commercial relationship. That said, every situation is different. Some suppliers may not carry insurance for particular losses, and others may not have sufficient insurance coverage to respond to multiple large-scale claims. In those circumstances, early advice can be particularly important, both to preserve evidence and to understand the practical options available. If you believe a seed variety, chemical or other agricultural product has not performed as represented, keep detailed records, obtain independent agronomic advice and seek legal advice before signing any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement. The earlier advice is obtained, the more options are generally available. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.
October 29, 2026
Recent concerns regarding the performance of certain canola varieties have attracted significant attention across the Western Australian grain industry. The issue was recently discussed on the ABC WA Country Hour, where Philip Brunner, Director of Bailiwick Legal, commented on the legal issues that may arise when agricultural products fail to perform as expected. Farmers understand that crop performance can be affected by seasonal conditions, rainfall, frost, pests, disease and other factors beyond their control. However, different considerations may arise where a seed, chemical or agricultural product does not perform consistently with the representations made by the supplier at the time of sale. A well-publicised dispute involving John Snooke, a grower from Cunderdin, highlighted these issues when concerns were raised regarding the performance of a herbicide-tolerant canola variety. Following intervention by the WA Department of Consumer Protection, compensation was ultimately paid to affected growers. As input costs continue to increase, growers should be aware that legal protections may be available where a product: Does not match its description; Is not fit for its intended purpose; or Fails to perform in accordance with representations made by the supplier. If a crop is underperforming, growers should retain seed tags, invoices, marketing materials and paddock records, obtain independent agronomic advice and notify the supplier as soon as possible. Early evidence can be critical in assessing whether a legal claim may exist. Importantly, growers should not sign any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement (NDA) without first obtaining independent legal advice. These documents may limit future rights or prevent growers from discussing the issue with others who may be similarly affected. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.