Is Carbon Farming right for you?

October 29, 2026

Author name

Phil and Matilda discuss what you need to consider before committing to Carbon Farming.

As a farmer, you’re looking for the best ways to make your land work for you, whether that is producing grain, livestock, or other commodities such as carbon.


For many years, Western Australian farmers have looked for ways to sequester carbon and improve their soil health and ultimately their productivity. In more recent times farmers have also look to carbon farming as a source of income.


In the last year the value of global carbon markets has surged to a record of $851 billion, which has certainly attracted more farmers to carbon farming.  $815 billion dollars!!


To help farmers navigate carbon and this growing industry we did a Live on our Facebook page (which you should definitely check out), but if you missed it, here are the main takeaways:


Legislation


Much like any other source of farming income, to get into carbon farming, you’ll need to get acquainted with the legislation surrounding the activity, which mainly means getting acquainted with the emissions reduction fund.

 

This government fund is focused on incentivising actions that either diminish carbon emissions or store carbon by giving those that undertake said activities the opportunity to earn Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCU’s).


Each ACCU is equivalent to 1 metric  tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO-e) net abatement, and they can be sold either to the government or in the open market.



There tend to be two methods of acquiring ACCUs.One is through the “sequestration of carbon” which is done by trapping carbon either into trees or into the soil, and the other is by lowering emissions in the farm’s daily activities. .


If you want your carbon entrapment to be considered eligible, you’ll need an approved method for measuring abatement, and land managers will need to check on the guidelines of different methodologies to pick one that suits their project.


For sequestration to continuously earn you credits, it needs to fulfill permanence obligations. That is, the quantity of carbon sequestered must increase at a certain rate for 25 to 100 years.


Selling your Carbon Credits


Great! So now you have carbon credits that you can sell and make quite a bit of income from, but how exactly do you sell them?


You have two main options: selling it to the government, or to the open private market.


If you’re going with the first option, you’ll have to wait for the next government carbon auction, which happens twice a year, where you’ll put up your credits for sale, either to the government itself or to other businesses looking to reduce their emissions.


The open market, on the other hand, works on a more conventional method, where you advertise your credits and interested parties, which will normally be companies, or even investors, can buy them for themselves.


This can be extremely profitable, as demonstrated by Willmot Cattle Co, which sold its carbon soil sequestration credits to Microsoft for $500,000..


As we always emphasise here at Bailiwick, you need to pay very close attention to your contract as it could contain a reverse clause, which obligates you to pay back received credits if you don’t meet a certain carbon quota.


Risks


Now, much like any investment, carbon farming does come with its own assortment of risks and caveats, some less obvious than others, with a main one, being the permanence period.


It’s not hard to imagine why, after all, 25 to 100 years is a really long time for you to lock up your land.


Indeed, how can you be sure that carbon farming will yield more return than crops or livestock? That will largely depend on your eligibility for government funding, since without it, the entirety of the project will come out of your own pocket at a great expense.


Also, there is the simple matter of what you’re going to do with all the trees on your property if you fail to meet the carbon quota, especially since clearing can be quite expensive. Will the land still be usable?


What’s more, the ERF wants you to start the project from the beginning, so you can’t really be eligible, if there already are trees in your property.


Mining Tenements


Earlier on we mentioned caveats, something else to look out for is that mining tenants, that is, hosting a mining operation in your land can have an effect on your carbon credit eligibility.


If the mining company approaches you after you’ve already established a carbon project, the best thing to do is sit them down and talk about compensation, particularly if mining operations are likely to encroach on your carbon project. Once again, it's all about your contracts.


On the other hand, if the situation is reversed and you already have a mining tenement on your land, and you’ve been playing with the idea of starting a carbon project, you’ll essentially be forced by the government to reach an agreement with the company for use of the land you’ve leased.


There are pros and cons to this alone, but once again the outcome is affected by a series of variables, including the location of your property, of the mining operation, and of course the carbon project within it.


Conclusion


When considering the risks and concerns of carbon farming you have consider whether the environmental benefits and income potential from carbon credits is be worth you locking away a portion of your land for 25-100 years.


The best way to approach carbon is with caution, looking at your particular circumstances and evaluating your chances of securing funding for your project But you don’t have to do it alone, in fact, it would be wise not to.


So, if you are considering getting into carbon farming, don’t be afraid to ask for the legal advice of the experts at Bailiwick as we are always available to provide you with assistance on your rights and opportunities as a rural landowner.


Watch more videos
October 29, 2026
For many growers, the biggest barrier to pursuing a claim is not the legal process itself. It is the relationship. In regional communities, suppliers, agronomists and growers often work together over many years, and many farmers are understandably reluctant to raise concerns if they believe it may damage a valued business relationship. Recent discussions regarding the performance of certain canola varieties have highlighted an important issue for farming businesses: protecting your legal rights does not necessarily mean taking an aggressive approach or ending a long-standing commercial relationship. Where concerns arise about the performance of a seed variety, chemical or other agricultural product, growers are often hesitant to make inquiries or seek compensation because the supplier may be a trusted local business or a person they have dealt with for decades. However, raising legitimate concerns and seeking advice should not be viewed as a personal attack. In many cases, suppliers will notify their insurer as soon as a significant claim is raised. From that point, discussions regarding liability and compensation are often managed by insurers, loss assessors and legal representatives. As a result, a grower may effectively be dealing with an insurance claim rather than a dispute directly with the supplier. That distinction is important. A claim can often be investigated and resolved without permanently damaging an otherwise productive business relationship. At the same time, growers should be aware that not every supplier is insured for every type of loss. Some businesses may not carry insurance that responds to large-scale agricultural claims, while others may not have sufficient coverage where multiple growers are affected. Early advice can therefore be critical in understanding both your legal position and the practical realities of recovery.  If you are experiencing concerns regarding crop performance, keep detailed records, retain product packaging, batch information, invoices and correspondence, obtain independent agronomic advice, and seek legal advice before signing any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Protecting your rights does not have to mean burning bridges. Often, the best outcomes are achieved through early communication, careful investigation and practical resolution. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.
October 29, 2026
One of the most common concerns we hear from growers experiencing issues with agricultural products is: "I don't want to sue someone I've known for years." In regional communities, business relationships matter. Suppliers, agronomists and growers often work together over many seasons, and many farmers are understandably reluctant to take action if they believe doing so may damage those relationships. However, pursuing a claim does not necessarily mean attacking a long-standing business relationship. In many cases, the supplier will notify its insurer of the claim and the matter will be managed by the insurer and its representatives. Where insurance is available, discussions regarding compensation often proceed through the insurer's claims process rather than as a personal dispute between grower and supplier. For that reason, growers should not assume that raising legitimate concerns about product performance will automatically result in the loss of an important commercial relationship. That said, every situation is different. Some suppliers may not carry insurance for particular losses, and others may not have sufficient insurance coverage to respond to multiple large-scale claims. In those circumstances, early advice can be particularly important, both to preserve evidence and to understand the practical options available. If you believe a seed variety, chemical or other agricultural product has not performed as represented, keep detailed records, obtain independent agronomic advice and seek legal advice before signing any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement. The earlier advice is obtained, the more options are generally available. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.
October 29, 2026
Recent concerns regarding the performance of certain canola varieties have attracted significant attention across the Western Australian grain industry. The issue was recently discussed on the ABC WA Country Hour, where Philip Brunner, Director of Bailiwick Legal, commented on the legal issues that may arise when agricultural products fail to perform as expected. Farmers understand that crop performance can be affected by seasonal conditions, rainfall, frost, pests, disease and other factors beyond their control. However, different considerations may arise where a seed, chemical or agricultural product does not perform consistently with the representations made by the supplier at the time of sale. A well-publicised dispute involving John Snooke, a grower from Cunderdin, highlighted these issues when concerns were raised regarding the performance of a herbicide-tolerant canola variety. Following intervention by the WA Department of Consumer Protection, compensation was ultimately paid to affected growers. As input costs continue to increase, growers should be aware that legal protections may be available where a product: Does not match its description; Is not fit for its intended purpose; or Fails to perform in accordance with representations made by the supplier. If a crop is underperforming, growers should retain seed tags, invoices, marketing materials and paddock records, obtain independent agronomic advice and notify the supplier as soon as possible. Early evidence can be critical in assessing whether a legal claim may exist. Importantly, growers should not sign any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement (NDA) without first obtaining independent legal advice. These documents may limit future rights or prevent growers from discussing the issue with others who may be similarly affected. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.