High Court Decides on Workpac v Rossato
February 19, 2026
Author name
On 4 August 2021, the High Court unanimously overturned the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia’s decision in Workpac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84 and the precedent set in the Full Federal Court judgment of Skene v WorkPac Pty Ltd (2018) 264 FCR 536, being cases which dealt with the nature of casual employment.
In WorkPac v Rossato & Ors
[2021] HCA 23 (‘WorkPac v Rossato’), the High Court found that Mr Rossato was a casual employee for the purposes of WorkPac’s Enterprise Agreement and the Fair Work Act 2009
(Cth), thus excluding Mr Rossato from entitlements, such as paid annual leave, that apply to permanent employees.
To read more about the Federal Court decision, you can view our article here.
Background
Mr Rossato was employed by WorkPac, a labour hire company, on a series of separate casual employment contracts between 2014 and 2018 and was recognised (and paid) as a casual employee under WorkPac’s 2012 Mining (Coal) Industry Enterprise Agreement.
After his last engagement with WorkPac had ended, Mr Rossato claimed he was a permanent employee rather than a casual and was therefore entitled to receive annual leave and personal leave entitlements. In particular, Mr Rossato claimed:
- He had regular and ongoing employment, due to receiving a set roster a year in advance in addition to regular shift patterns;
- His shift hours were standard and rarely deviated from his roster; and
- WorkPac expected Mr Rossato would attend every shift.
Overall, the core issues before the High Court were whether Mr Rossato had a ‘firm advanced commitment’ that was an enforceable term of his contract, and whether the express terms of Mr Rossato’s written contracts of employment had primacy.
High Court Decision
The majority of the High Court rejected the notion that the employment relationship between the parties was to be established by analysing ‘the real substance, practical reality and true nature of that relationship’. In considering whether Mr Rossato had any ‘firm advance commitment as to the duration of his employment’ the Court identified that the appropriate method to assess this question was to look to the employee’s several written employment contracts.
In particular, the Court noted the express terms of Mr Rossato’s contracts, including:
- Mr Rossato was engaged on several separate contracts for specified periods of time;
- Mr Rossato could accept or reject any offer of work;
- the contract could be terminated on one hour’s notice;
- Mr Rossato did receive a casual loading; and
- the specification of daily working hours could be varied.
Additionally, the High Court gave limited weight to two other factors which the Full Court of the Federal Court had deemed relevant:
- WorkPac’s ability to terminate or vary Mr Rossato’s shifts and roster on one hour’s notice; and
- Mr Rossato’s work obligations being consistent and organised well in advance in accordance with WorkPac’s rosters.
The Court ultimately concluded that the express contractual terms agreed between Mr Rossato and WorkPac did not evidence a ‘firm advance commitment’ which Mr Rossato was able to enforce. Whilst the Court said that Mr Rossato may have had a reasonable expectation of continuing employment, this did not amount to an advance firm commitment to ongoing employment and was not an enforceable term of his contracts.
Key Takeaways
The High Court’s decision reinforces the need for employers to have carefully constructed and drafted employment contracts. The Court gave primacy to the express terms of Mr Rossato’s written contracts and dispelled notions of “expectations” as enforceable contractual terms.
We recommend that employers review their employment contracts and seek advice in relation to the engagement of casual employees in particular.
To view the full decision please click here.
If you need assistance with your employment contracts, or seek further information in relation to your legal rights and responsibilities, please contact us on (08) 9321 5451 or by email at phil@bailiwicklegal.com.au.
The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on this information.

Bailiwick Legal has been honoured to support Forever Wild over the past few years as they delivered one of the most significant conservation land acquisition programs undertaken in Western Australia. Our team assisted Forever Wild with the strategic purchase of four pastoral stations, Narndee , Boodanoo , Meeline and Challa , transactions that now connect three State Reserves and protect more than 12,000 square kilometres of land. To put that scale into perspective, the combined area is approximately five times the size of the ACT and nearly one-fifth the size of Tasmania . Navigating complexity at scale These were not straightforward property transactions. Each acquisition involved: Multiple pastoral leases Layered regulatory and approval pathways Significant operational and on-ground assets Numerous stakeholders across government, industry and land management Our role was to guide Forever Wild through this complexity with clarity, precision and confidence, ensuring each transaction progressed efficiently while managing risk and safeguarding long-term objectives. “ Forever Wild is creating a world-leading model for nature funding that demonstrates we can manage viable, working pastoral stations whilst also restoring and protecting local ecological flora and fauna, and engaging and supporting Indigenous people and local communities. Complex & challenging, but this initiative could literally change the world .” Jessica Brunner - Director, Bailiwick Legal A growing and evolving legal landscape Large-scale conservation acquisitions sit within an emerging and increasingly complex legal field , intersecting land tenure, pastoral regulation, environmental frameworks and commercial considerations. These matters demand a deep understanding of both the legal mechanics and the practical realities of operating in regional and remote Australia. Our team’s experience in agribusiness, pastoral land transactions and regulatory approvals allowed us to support Forever Wild at every stage, from strategic structuring through to completion. Proud to support leadership in nature finance Forever Wild is widely recognised as an industry leader and a steadfast advocate for nature finance initiatives , helping pave the way for greater accessibility and innovation in conservation funding and land stewardship. We are proud to have contributed our relationships, expertise and practical legal insight to help Forever Wild achieve its vision, and to have played a role, however small, in shaping a groundbreaking future for conservation in Australia. At Bailiwick Legal, we value the opportunity to work alongside organisations that are thinking long-term, acting boldly, and creating outcomes that extend well beyond the transaction itself. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.

Bailiwick Legal Advises on Landmark Acquisition of Rawlinna Station by Consolidated Pastoral Company
Bailiwick Legal is proud to have acted for Consolidated Pastoral Company (CPC) in its successful acquisition of Rawlinna Station , Australia’s largest sheep station, located on the remote Nullarbor Plain in Western Australia. Spanning over 1 million hectares and running approximately 30,000 sheep , Rawlinna is an iconic pastoral asset with a rich legacy, having been held by the MacLachlan family’s Jumbuck Pastoral Company since its establishment in 1962. The sale marks the first change of ownership in over six decades and was finalised following formal approval from the Western Australian Government for the transfer of the pastoral leases. This transaction involved navigating: The transfer of three separate pastoral leases Coordination across multiple vendor entities Consideration of livestock and operating assets Fulfilment of regulatory and compliance requirements, including WA lease approval processes Bailiwick Legal is a boutique agricultural and regional law firm , proudly based in Perth and Bridgetown, Western Australia. Our role in this acquisition demonstrates that deep sector knowledge, local insight, and personalised legal support are crucial for agribusiness clients managing complex, high-value transactions. Our team, led by our regionally-based solicitor, Matilda Lloyd, provided end-to-end legal and strategic support, including: Due diligence on land tenure and operating assets Contract negotiation and preparation Advice on regulatory approvals and compliance Strategic coordination with CPC’s internal and external stakeholders to ensure a smooth and timely settlement We are honoured to have supported CPC in this milestone acquisition and look forward to watching Rawlinna’s next chapter unfolds. At Bailiwick Legal, we believe that regional expertise, deep industry knowledge, and relationship-based service remain essential to agribusiness success, no matter the scale. Congratulations to all parties involved, including the MacLachlan family, whose stewardship of Rawlinna leaves a lasting legacy in Australian agriculture. – The Bailiwick Legal Team Working alongside agribusinesses to grow, transition, and thrive . For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au By Matilda Lloyd (Associate) For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.











