Should you open the Farm Gate to a Mining or Oil & Gas Company?
October 29, 2026
Author name
Over the last few years there has been a noticeable increase in mineral exploration in Western Australia, particularly within the southwest region.
So, when someone out of the blue turns up at your door offering a deal for access rights, it is in your interest to seek legal advice. At Bailiwick Legal, we have assisted many land owners and farm businesses in such circumstances.
The following article provides some general advice about access and the rights of the farm land holders. The information in this article is general in nature and is not legal advice. We recommend that you speak to your legal advisor before taking any action.
Mining
First we are going to have a look at the mining industry, and what your options are when a representative of a mining company seeks access to explore for mineral resources on your land.
“Right of Veto”
Under the Mining Act 1981, the owner or occupier of land under cultivation (usually referred to as “arable land”) has what is commonly called a “right of veto”: that is, the right to politely say “No, you cannot explore on my land”.
This right is especially useful today as farmers are becoming increasingly wary about who is accessing their land and importantly, what biosecurity measures are proposed to be taken if access is granted.
If you decide to exercise your right of veto, you can feel secure in the knowledge that there is nothing more that a mining company can do, as there is no mechanism under the Mining Act to force you to allow access.
However, this right of veto only protects you if you haven’t previously given permission to a mining company to access and explore on your land. If you have already consented to access in the past, your rights are likely to be significantly limited.
Granting Access
Now, if you have no objection to a mining company having access to your land we advise that you negotiate an “access and compensation agreement”. If you take this course, you also need to be very careful.
You need to take a good look at the terms of any access and compensation agreement proposed and make sure granting access will not leave you disadvantaged or displace your right to farm the land. It is important to know what the mining company is looking for, what works it is proposing to undertake, the timing of those works and what compensation is being offered in return for access to the land. Also, question what biosecurity measures the mining company plans to adopt, and again importantly, how these activities are likley to impact on your production program.
The Mining Register
Under the Mining Act the Department of Mines is required to maintain a register of “mining tenements”. This register is a critical reference for ascertaining who owns a mining tenement and what land the mining tenement falls over.
If you have already granted a mining company access to your land it is likely that your land has been formally “added” to the register for the relevant mining tenement. If this is the case, then it will likely be easier for a mining company to obtain a mining lease (where there is a commercial ore body), and your right may be limited to negotiating further compensation.
The Price of Not Setting a Price
It is of some concern the amount of times I have been informed by landowners or occupiers of land, that they have simply allowed a company to explore on their land where no access and compensation agreement, or any agreement, has been reached. In such circumstances, land owners and occupiers may well be limiting or negating any rights they have under the Mining Act.
Oil and Gas
When considering exploration for hydrocarbons, the laws around access to farm land are significantly different.
Under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967, there is no such thing as a “right of veto”, and if an agreement to access and compensation is not reached, one of the parties can commence proceedings in the nearest Magistrates Court to seek a determination of compensation.
In our experience, on most occasions the parties reach an agreement in relation to access, timing, compensation and biosecurity measures, to name a few of the key components to an access agreement. However, occassionally companies seeking to explore for hydrocarbons on farm land (by drilling an exploration well) have commenced an action in the Magistrates Court because an agreement to compensation has not been reached. All of these have settled in one way or another and none, as yet, have gone to a trial.
In 2015, APPEA (Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association), WAFarmers, the PGA and vegesWA negotiated a template Access and Compensation Agreement for use within the rural sector. This template is available from the organisations named and is a useful tool for farmers.
Not all companies use this template, and because the land owner and occupier do not have a “right of veto”, we recommend the obtaining of advice and assistance from your lawyer as soon as possible if approached.
Conclusion
The intricacies of the legal relationship between farmers and mining or oil and gas companies is substantial.
Given our experience with these agreements and dealing with such companies, the team at Bailiwick Legal are well placed available to provide you with guidance, and ensure that you are not only aware of your rights, but also to assist you in engaging your rights to best suit your interests.
So, if you are asked for access to your land by a mining company, or by company that wants to drill an exploration well (or even a production well), and you're wondering if you should agree to that access, pause and take a step back and then give us a call. We are here to help you with that decision.
For many growers, the biggest barrier to pursuing a claim is not the legal process itself. It is the relationship. In regional communities, suppliers, agronomists and growers often work together over many years, and many farmers are understandably reluctant to raise concerns if they believe it may damage a valued business relationship. Recent discussions regarding the performance of certain canola varieties have highlighted an important issue for farming businesses: protecting your legal rights does not necessarily mean taking an aggressive approach or ending a long-standing commercial relationship. Where concerns arise about the performance of a seed variety, chemical or other agricultural product, growers are often hesitant to make inquiries or seek compensation because the supplier may be a trusted local business or a person they have dealt with for decades. However, raising legitimate concerns and seeking advice should not be viewed as a personal attack. In many cases, suppliers will notify their insurer as soon as a significant claim is raised. From that point, discussions regarding liability and compensation are often managed by insurers, loss assessors and legal representatives. As a result, a grower may effectively be dealing with an insurance claim rather than a dispute directly with the supplier. That distinction is important. A claim can often be investigated and resolved without permanently damaging an otherwise productive business relationship. At the same time, growers should be aware that not every supplier is insured for every type of loss. Some businesses may not carry insurance that responds to large-scale agricultural claims, while others may not have sufficient coverage where multiple growers are affected. Early advice can therefore be critical in understanding both your legal position and the practical realities of recovery. If you are experiencing concerns regarding crop performance, keep detailed records, retain product packaging, batch information, invoices and correspondence, obtain independent agronomic advice, and seek legal advice before signing any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Protecting your rights does not have to mean burning bridges. Often, the best outcomes are achieved through early communication, careful investigation and practical resolution. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.
One of the most common concerns we hear from growers experiencing issues with agricultural products is: "I don't want to sue someone I've known for years." In regional communities, business relationships matter. Suppliers, agronomists and growers often work together over many seasons, and many farmers are understandably reluctant to take action if they believe doing so may damage those relationships. However, pursuing a claim does not necessarily mean attacking a long-standing business relationship. In many cases, the supplier will notify its insurer of the claim and the matter will be managed by the insurer and its representatives. Where insurance is available, discussions regarding compensation often proceed through the insurer's claims process rather than as a personal dispute between grower and supplier. For that reason, growers should not assume that raising legitimate concerns about product performance will automatically result in the loss of an important commercial relationship. That said, every situation is different. Some suppliers may not carry insurance for particular losses, and others may not have sufficient insurance coverage to respond to multiple large-scale claims. In those circumstances, early advice can be particularly important, both to preserve evidence and to understand the practical options available. If you believe a seed variety, chemical or other agricultural product has not performed as represented, keep detailed records, obtain independent agronomic advice and seek legal advice before signing any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement. The earlier advice is obtained, the more options are generally available. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.
Recent concerns regarding the performance of certain canola varieties have attracted significant attention across the Western Australian grain industry. The issue was recently discussed on the ABC WA Country Hour, where Philip Brunner, Director of Bailiwick Legal, commented on the legal issues that may arise when agricultural products fail to perform as expected. Farmers understand that crop performance can be affected by seasonal conditions, rainfall, frost, pests, disease and other factors beyond their control. However, different considerations may arise where a seed, chemical or agricultural product does not perform consistently with the representations made by the supplier at the time of sale. A well-publicised dispute involving John Snooke, a grower from Cunderdin, highlighted these issues when concerns were raised regarding the performance of a herbicide-tolerant canola variety. Following intervention by the WA Department of Consumer Protection, compensation was ultimately paid to affected growers. As input costs continue to increase, growers should be aware that legal protections may be available where a product: Does not match its description; Is not fit for its intended purpose; or Fails to perform in accordance with representations made by the supplier. If a crop is underperforming, growers should retain seed tags, invoices, marketing materials and paddock records, obtain independent agronomic advice and notify the supplier as soon as possible. Early evidence can be critical in assessing whether a legal claim may exist. Importantly, growers should not sign any settlement agreement, release or non-disclosure agreement (NDA) without first obtaining independent legal advice. These documents may limit future rights or prevent growers from discussing the issue with others who may be similarly affected. Author: Matilda Lloyd, Associate Director of Bailiwick Legal, assists farming families and agribusinesses throughout Western Australia with commercial disputes and risk management. For assistance with all of your agribusiness needs, contact Bailiwick Legal: West Perth Office on 08 9321 5451 or email office@bailiwicklegal.com.au Bridgetwoen Office on 08 6288 6240 or email bridgetown@bailiwicklegal.com.au For further information about our legal services, please visit our website: https://www.bailiwicklegal.com.au The above information is a summary and overview of the matters discussed. This publication does not constitute legal advice and you should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content.
